Enter from the back we must not

I am interested to follow the hot case of Anwar and Saiful because I am curious. However, when I googled, I found this as the latest.

Read full:

KUALA LUMPUR: A Malaysiakini news article was produced in court by Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim’s lead counsel Karpal Singh, during the cross-examination of key witness Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan at the High Court here this morning.11.05am: Karpal gave the article ‘Saya diliwat tanpa rela‘ on Aug 15, 2008, for the witness to read.Karpal: What is in the article, is true?

Mohd Saiful: There is an error there. The others are correct.

Karpal: What’s the error?

Mohd Saiful: It says that I was only sodomised once. That’s the error. I was sodomized three times. I misinterpreted the question.

Karpal: Did u tell the reporter that you were sodomised by Anwar the first time and never sodomized before?

Mohd Saiful: I did tell the reporter.

Karpal: You lied in this court when you said that you met Najib (Datuk Seri Najib Razak) on June 24 (2008), and that you complained you were sodomised by Anwar a few times?

Mohd Saiful: I don’t agree.

You see, my students once fought because one of them did an action similar to sodomy. The ‘victim’ was angry and hit his friend.

“Cikgu dia buat aksi lucah yang macam ni macam ni kat saya!”
“Apa yang awak nak buat sebenarnya?”
“Takde pape, saya saja je. Saya buat macam ni macam ni je.”
“Erk…” *Cikgu pun tak reti nak marah ke explain*

You see, I have no idea how to handle this case. I wonder how the judge can handle Anwar’s case. And I need to understand the case so that I can explain to them clearly when they asked what is really a sodomy? Whose to be blamed and punished? *Pening*

PS: Sometimes a teacher needs to be a lawyer.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.